Latest Press Release
20-03-2008
High Court Judgment on "Wanchai Temporary Reclamation"
Government reclamation plan
Temporary reclamation plan
10-05-2007
Position Statement Judicial Review on Wanchai "Temporary Reclamation"
10-01-2007
Central Reclamation – No Proper Public Consultation
01-12-2006
Reclamation and Air Pollution:
A City Losing its Lungs Author: Mr.Winston Chu
13-11-2006
Hong Kong Rallies to Support the Protection of Victoria Harbour
07-11-2006
Love our harbour - support the
"Walk of the Harbour" & "Harbour Carnival"
29-06-2006
1st July March
22-06-2006
Report on Contaminated Mud in the Tamar Reclamation
20-06-2006
Tamar - Government's Commitment "People-based Government"
Public Message from Mr.Simon F.S. Li & Mr.Winston K.S. Chu
12-06-2006
Tamar - Response to Government’s Public Statement
From Mr. Simon F.S. Li & Mr. Winston K.S. Chu
05-06-2006
Tamar – Need For Public Consultation
Public Message From Mr. Simon F.S. Li & Mr. Winston K.S. Chu
01-06-2006
SPH Press Conference: Public Message from Mr. Simon F.S. Li regarding the proposed Government headquarters on Tamar 26-05-2006
Tamar Development - Municipal Centre
26-04-2006
Invitation: Sunday, 30 April 2006 “OUR Tamar Day” Carnival
21-02-2006
88% of Hong Kong People Want a Greener Harbourfront
Harbour Business Forum Released the findings of a comprehensive public opinion survey on Victoria Harbour. For detail, please visit:
09-02-2006
First Open Meeting of Subcommittee to Review the Planning for the Central Waterfront (including the Tamar Site): Alliance dissatisfied with Government Responses
26-01-2006
"Central Park": NEW Plan for NEW Central An alternative plan for the Central waterfront
23-01-2006
"Planning for West Kowloon and the Harbour-front" Public Opinion Survey
by The University of Hong Kong: Public Rejects Government Proposed West Kowloon Cultural District
In summary, the key findings are:
a.. 81% prefer cultural plus leisure facilities including a large green park;
b.. When given full information on the cost and visual impact, 77% oppose a canopy;
c.. 90% of the respondents support planning and development by an Authority or
quasi-Government agencies - only 6% opted for management by private developers;
d.. 65% believe that harbour reclamation was excessive;
e.. 72% objected to commercial and residential development on the west Kowloon Cultural District ;
f.. 62% believe Hong Kong does not have sufficient open space and green parks;
g.. 64% believe Hong Kong lags behind international cities in terms of open space and parks;
h.. 90% liked the idea of developing Hong Kong into an environmentally friendly city.
17-12-2005
CIVIL SOCIETY DECLARES VICTORY STOP and RETHINK: No Rush for the Tamar Site!
10-11-2005
"Harbour Week Carnival"
02-11-2005
Harbour Week
24-9-2005
Request For Independent Review - Central & Wanchai Districts
08-9-2005
A Day to Celebrate - Harbour Day on 13 November 2005 Special Photo Competition and Exhibition
05-8-2005
SPH is disappointed about TPB's rejection
22-7-2005
TPB meet again in two weeks to discuss CRIII
19-7-2005
SPH+SOS+CTA Joint Press Conference: Demand for Good Governance
22-4-2005
Kids Love the Harbour Campaign 250 Kids Paint Hopes for the Victoria Harbour on 4.22 Earth Day
19-4-2005
Kids Love the Harbour Campaign
Views of The Society:Presentation to the Harbour Business Forum
No Appeal Against the High Court Judgment
18-4-2005
Harbour Business Forum Briefing on Monday, 18th April 2005 Presented by Winston Ka Sun Chu, Adviser
16-4-2005
Victoria
Harbour - Desperately Saving Victoria
4-3-2005
Message
of Thanks - 'Save Our Harbour' Campaign
2-1-2005
The Pulse -- From ATV
30-10-2004
The Central District (Extension) Outline Zoning Plan No. S/H24/6
(Sep, 2004)
Proposals To Amend the Outline Zoning Plan to Reduce the Amount
of Reclamation, Reduce the Amount of Commercial Development and
Reduce the Extent of Roads
Volume
1 Planning Statement (PDF file, large size: 6M)
Volume
2 Technical Appendices (PDF file, large size: 14M)
22-9-2004
Signature Campaign
|
|
|
Reclaimations proposed by Government |
|
Central Reclamation |
Our Society hereby announces the official commencement of a Signature
Campaign as part of our "Save Our Harbour" Campaign that we have
been undertaking for the past nine years. The purpose of the Campaign
is to stop the Government from permanently damaging the Harbour,
and ruining Hong Kong's Central District through massive development.
This is the last chance for Hong Kong people to speak up and to
demand that the newly elected Legislative Council and the Government
will hear their voices. We aim to collect at least 100,000 signatures
and hopefully even more.
Our Society has done everything we can which includes taking the
Government to the Court of Final Appeal where we won an unanimous
judgment. However, our Society has found that the law cannot protect
the Harbour because we are unable to enforce the law against the
Government. Therefore it is up to the people of Hong Kong to look
after the Harbour which is their own special public asset for the
benefit of themselves and future generations. We appeal to the people
of Hong Kong to support this Signature Campaign.
For more information, please click here ...
8-9-2004
Central Reclamation and
Post-Reclamation Development
Changing the Face of Central - For the Worse
ESPH’s Submission to TPB to Review Central Plans
The Society for Protection of the Harbour (SPH) submitted to the
Town Planning Board (TPB) today that the TPB should use an existing
administrative procedure to request the Executive Council to refer
the Central (Extension) Outline Zoning Plan (CEOZP) back to the
TPB for consideration as the public interest is best served by such
a review.
Excessive Land for Commercial Development
The SPH believes that as a consequence of the Court of Final Appeal
judgment on the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance handed down
on 9 January 2004, the scale of Central Reclamation can and should
be reduced by about 5 ha. Furthermore, the use to which new and
existing land in Central is to be used post-reclamation under the
CEOZP will alter the face of Central forever for the worse, as prime
areas will be put for massive commercial and retail complexes even
though the Chief Executive said publicly on 17 October 2003 that
there would be no commercial buildings on the reclamation [4.4.2].
According to the CEOZP, there will be SIX development zones slated
to provide 1,422,000 sq.m. (15.3 million sq. ft.) of commercial
and office space, a large portion of which will come from new reclamation
[Section 4.4].
“The public thinks that the reclaimed areas will be used
for parks and a promenade when in fact most of it will be used by
the government for land sales to develop offices and shopping malls
with little relationship to the people’s enjoyment of the
Harbour. Indeed, the entire face of Central from Statute Square
to beyond City Hall will be dominated by what the government calls
a Groundscraper, which is really a skyscraper laid horizontally”,
said Christine Loh, the SPH’s chairperson.
Proper Land Use
Instead, the SPH believes that the land created from reclamation
should be used to create a signature public space as a legacy for
Hong Kong as a whole. The SPH emphasized to the TPB in its submission
that: “A scarce public resource, the water, has been depleted
and in its place a lower order public resource, land, has been created.
The public should therefore have the absolute right to the proper
use of that land” [3.4.2].
Excessive Roads
The Government claims that Central Reclamation III is necessary
in order to build the Central Wanchai By-pass (CWB) to relieve traffic.
The SPH’s traffic study accompanying its TPB submission notes
that the CEOZP includes massive surface roads beyond provision for
the CWB. Having assessed the surface roads (Road P2 network), SPH’s
traffic consultants recommended that these roads can be downsized
from a dual-3 through primary distributor into a much shorter dual-2
local access road which is reconfigured to maintain accessibility
and capacity.
“We found that the Government’s existing road plans
had in fact not taken into account new traffic reduction estimates.
Road designs have also not been reconfigured to ensure that if the
CWB is built that it will serve its design purpose to provide easy
access for traffic from the West to go East. As it stands, much
traffic will in fact use P2, leaving the CWB under-used and therefore
public resources wasted,” said Winston Chu, adviser to the
SPH.
Waterfront Park
The SPH proposes that the size of the reclamation can be reduced
and for the reclaimed areas to be used to create a large and lush
park that will become a defining, signature space for public enjoyment.
The proposals from the SPH will result in an extra 8 ha of public
park, or more than 15 football pitches.
For any enquiry about this press release, please contact our campaign
manager, Mr Angus Ho at 3101-8191, thank you.
Recent Press Releases
Central
Reclamation and Post-Reclamation Development
Changing the Face of Central - For the Worse
ESPH’s Submission to TPB to Review Central Plans
The Society for Protection of the Harbour (SPH) submitted to the
Town Planning Board (TPB) today that the TPB should use an existing
administrative procedure to request the Executive Council to refer
the Central (Extension) Outline Zoning Plan (CEOZP) back to the
TPB for consideration as the public interest is best served by such
a review.
Posted on Sep 8, 2004
Vote
for the Harbour Campaign
Elect to Protect Victoria Harbour on 12th September
The protection and preservation of Victoria Harbour is an extremely
important social and environmental issue for Hong Kong. In response
to the forthcoming September Legislative Council Elections, the
Society for Protection of the Harbour (SPH) has decided to conduct
a 'Vote For The Harbour' Campaign and is asking its supporters and
the Hong Kong public to cast their vote for the Harbour. SPH will
also undertake a signature campaign such that the community can
show their concern for and support of the Harbour.
Posted on Sep 2, 2004
No
Appeal Against the High Court Judgment
Our Society has taken further legal advice from our team of legal
advisers including Senior Counsel regarding the above Appeal in
the light of the following:-
Posted on April 19, 2004
Summary
Of & Quotations From Court of Final Appeal Judgment
Interpretation & Application of Harbour Ordinance
Effect of Judgment - The CFA Judgment stated that, as the
Town Planning Board had erred in law in the correct interpretation
of the Harbour Ordinance, the Board's decisions must be quashed
and the matter must be remitted back to the Board for reconsideration;
and that the Judgment applies to any reclamation proposal in the
Harbour.
Recent
Judgment of the High Court
The Judge pronounced that "It may well have been preferable
for the Chief Executive in Council to remit the (Central) plan (to
the Town Planning Board), at least regarding the extent of reclamation",
but decided that he had no power to order the Chief Executive in
Council to do so. The Judge also pronounced that he had "no
jurisdiction to determine whether the Chief Executive in Council
was right or wrong in his decision".
Posted on March 26, 2004
Central
Reclamation Phase III - HCAL 102 of 2003
The Central Reclamation Judicial Review was necessitated by the
recent Court of Final Appeal ("CFA") Judgment in respect
of the Wanchai Judicial Review.
Posted on March 19, 2004
Victory
for Victoria Harbour
Victory for Victoria Harbour Government must stop Central Reclamation
immediately In a clear and unambiguous judgment, the Court of Final
Appeal (CFA) unanimously upheld the High Court Judgment of Madam
Justice Chu on the correct interpretation of the Protection of...
Posted on January 9, 2004
Response to Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau’s Comments on
“Harbour Primer?dated 01/12/2003
In response to the Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau’s comment
on the “Harbour Primer? Friends of the Harbour would like
to clarify the three key issues raised: 1. Accusations made against
the material used for this pamphlet was inaccurate Contents...
Posted on December 11, 2003
Press
Conference - 27-11-03
Press Conference on Thursday, 27th November 2003 at 11:00 a.m.
at Room 2006, One Pacific Place, 88 Queensway, Hong Kong Alternative
Schemes for Central Wanchai Waterfront 1. Our Society is pleased
to circulate the Conceptual Plans and Explanatory Notes of...
Posted on November 28, 2003
Alternative
Two: Harbour Front for Central, Wan Chai and Causeway Bay
Summary The approach is conceptual, based on sustainable development
principles, good urban design and landscape design. Fundamental
Assumptions 1. The over-run tunnel for the Airport Railway will
need to be completed. 2. To build the Airport Railway over-run tunnel,
the...
Posted on November 27, 2003
Alternative
One : Harbour Front for Central, Wan Chai and Causeway Bay
Introduction The High Court has ruled that the Government’s
proposals for the waterfront in Wan Chai and Causeway Bay are excessive.
While that decision is still subject to appeal, it is apparent that
if the approach advocated by the Court...
Posted on November 27, 2003
January
2004
December
2003
November
2003
October
2003
September
2003
|